The Bi-Field Theory
By
William Hamilton III
From a
scientist: “The primary propulsion system is electro-magnetic flux
directional positive force generating system. The secondary propulsion system
is a anti-gravity (using fluid plasma) directional
negative force generating system. Remember, these are our terms. The entire
craft can be a super conductor or a super capacitor depending on how the
propulsion system is configured. Like I
said, the system is extremely complicated. Unless you understand the entire
system, which we don't, you won't understand what I am saying. The electrical
system works on a vacuum vacated energy principle. This system generates an
unlimited amount of power. The Visitors have determined that hydrogen has many
more isotopes than we thought. H5 is one isotopes they
harnessed and use as a catalyst inside the power device.”
What is a
negative force generating system?
This was
something proposed a long time ago by engineer Leonard G. Cramp in trying to
explain flying saucer propulsion when he alluded to the bi-field theory, the G
field and the R field. He says, “Of the G field-propelled craft discussed
earlier (the use of an artificially created gravitational field), we could say
that it was gravitationally moved towards
its point source, or, due to a decreased gravitational field strength above it,
it is repelled by the ‘denser’ space beneath, and either could be equally
true…of the R-field (Repulsion Field) vehicle, we might say that was
repulsively moved away from its point
source or, due to the increased
gravitational field strength below it, it is attracted to the less ‘dense’
space above, and either could be true..”
Leonard goes on to propose that both G-field and R-field, one
convertible into the other are in use in UFOs.
Paul Hill,
retired and now deceased NASA scientist in his excellent technical analysis of
UFOs in his book Unconventional Flying
Objects considers that the UFO generates a repulsive field. He says, “it is shown that the UFO field is not
of the static-electric or static-magnetic type.
Rather, it appears to be a quasi-static field of a negative-gravity
type. This is concluded because the data
shows that the UFO field repels all mass, not just electrically charged or
magnetic materials.”
He also
mentions, like Cramp, before him that the field must have some degree of field
focusing, that it goes out predominantly in one direction in order to give
control.
These ideas
now invoke a new idea in the field of cosmology termed dark energy. Dark energy is
thought to be smoothly distributed throughout the universe. Dark energy has a strong negative pressure of
the same order as its energy density.
Dark energy interacts only through gravity. Dark energy produces a repulsive force and drives the expansion of the universe.
The point to
be made here is that the extraterrestrial starship engineers have harnessed
both gravitation and repulsion as a means of traveling through interplanetary
and interstellar space. Perhaps they
have even been able to artificially create a wormhole tunnel to distant parts
of the galaxy through using their control of gravitation and dark energy.
Added 11/01/2005 – from:
http://www.ufoevidence.org/documents/doc909.htm
Synopsis
of 'Unconventional Flying Objects': JSE Review
H.E. Puthoff, Institute for Advanced Studies at
original sourcefair use notice
Summary: To the degree that the
engineering characteristics of UFOs can be estimated by empirical observation,
in my opinion the above-referenced, recently-published book by Paul Hill
provides the most reliable, concise summary of engineering-type data available.
[1] The data were compiled over decades of research by a Chief
Scientist-Manager at NASA's
|
Harold E. Puthoff
, Ph.D. |
Synopsis of Unconventional Flying Objects, by Paul
Hill, Hampton Roads Publ. Co., Charlottesville, VA,
1995 (ISBN 1-57174-027-9)
JSE Review by H. E. Puthoff, Ph.D., Institute for
Advanced Studies at Austin, TX 78759
To the degree that the engineering characteristics of UFOs can be estimated by
empirical observation, in my opinion the above-referenced, recently-published
book by Paul Hill provides the most reliable, concise summary of
engineering-type data available. [1] The data were compiled over decades of
research by a Chief Scientist-Manager at NASA's
One of the most consistently-observed characteristics of UFO flight is a
ubiquitous pattern in which they tilt to perform all maneuvers. Specifically,
they sit level to hover, tilt forward to move forward, tilt backward to stop,
bank to turn, and descend by "falling-leaf" or "silver-
dollar-wobble" motions. Detailed analysis by Hill shows that such motion
is inconsistent with aerodynamic requirements, but totally consistent with some
form of repulsive force-field propulsion. Not satisfied with paper analyses
alone, Hill arranged to have various forms of jet-supported and rotor-supported
circular flying platforms built and tested. Hill himself acted as test pilot in
early, originally-classified, versions, and found the above motions the most
economical for control purposes. Pictures of these platforms are included in
the text.
In an effort to examine the force-field propulsion hypothesis yet further, Hill
analyzed a number of cases involving near-field interactions with an apparent
craft in which some form of force was in evidence. These include examples in
which a person or vehicle was affected, tree branches were parted or broken,
roof tiles were dislodged, objects were deflected, and ground or water were
disturbed. Under close analysis the subtleties of these interactions combine to
point unequivocally to a repulsive force field surrounding the craft, while
discriminating against propulsion mechanisms involving jet action, pure
electric or magnetic effects, or the emission of energetic particles or
radiation (although the latter may accompany the propulsive mechanism as a
secondary effect). Further detailed investigation indicates that the particular
form of force field propulsion that satisfies observational constraints is what
Hill labels a directed acceleration field; that is, a field that is, in
general, gravitational-like in nature, and, in particular, gravity-canceling.
[3] Such a field acts on all masses in its sphere of influence as does a
gravitational field. Corollary to this conclusion is that observed
accelerations ~100 g's relative to the environment could be sustained without on-board
high-g forces.
One of the consequences of the above identification of field propulsion type by
Hill is his conclusion, supported by detailed calculation, computer simulation
and wind-tunnel studies, that supersonic flight through the atmosphere without
sonic booms is easily engineered. Manipulation of the acceleration-type force
field would, even at supersonic speeds, result in a constant-pressure,
compression-free zone without shockwave in which the vehicle is surrounded by a
subsonic flow-pattern of streamlines, and subsonic velocity ratios. An
additional benefit of such field control is that drops of moisture, rain, dust,
insects, or other low-velocity objects would follow streamline paths around the
craft rather than impact it.
Another puzzle resolved by Hill's analysis is that craft observed to travel
continuously at Mach 4 or 5 do not appear to generate temperatures sufficiently
high to be destructive to known materials. In other words, UFOs appear to
prevent high aerodynamic heating rates, rather than permitting a heating
problem, then surviving it with heat- resistant materials as is the case of the
Shuttle whose surface temperatures can reach 1300 degrees C. The resolution of
this potential problem is shown by Hill to derive from the fact that the
force-field control that results in the prevention of shockwave drag as
discussed above is also effective in preventing aerodynamic heating. In effect
the airflow approaches, then springs away from the craft, depositing no energy
in the process.
A further example of the type of correlation that emerges from Hill's
analytical approach is provided by an analysis of the economy of various
flight-path profiles. It is shown that high-angle, high- acceleration
departures on ballistic-arc trajectories with high-speed coast segments are
more efficient than, for example, intermediate-level, horizontal-path trips,
both in terms of required impulse-per-unit-mass and time-of-flight parameters.
This he correlates with the observation that UFO departures are of the
dramatically high-angle, high-acceleration type.
Also of interest is Hill's analysis of the spectra and intensity of an apparent
plasma sheath surrounding such craft, the details of which correlate with what
one would expect in terms of it being a secondary effect associated with the
propulsion system, for example, a blue shift and intensity increase during a
"power-up" phase, and the opposite during hover or landing maneuvers.
An additional fine point that emerges from this analysis is resolution of the
paradox that observation on a direct line-of-sight to a near part of the craft
can reveal a metallic-like structure while the attempt to observe the outline
of the craft, necessarily by an oblique line-of-sight, results in an indistinct
blur. Analysis shows this to be a reasonable outcome of an
expected re- absorption of reflected light by the surrounding plasma in
the longer- length path associated with the more oblique view.
Another typical nugget of information is found in Hill's discussion of the results
of the analysis of a possible UFO artifact, the famous Ubatuba
magnesium fragments claimed to have originated from an exploded unidentified
craft near
Additional calculations concerning the parameters of interstellar travel
(including relativistic effects), and the energetics
of such travel, have been performed and are included in tabular and graphical
form. The wealth of material in these sections, along with discussion of the
broad implications of this material, reveal the dedication and thoroughness of
Hill's approach to his self-assigned task.
In the final analysis, one must conclude that Hill has assembled as good a case
as can be made on the basis of presently available data that the observation of
some "unconventional flying objects" is compatible with the presence
of engineered platforms weighing in at something around 30 tons, which are
capable of 100-g accelerations and 9000-mph speeds in the atmosphere. Perhaps
more important for the technical reader, however, is Hill's supporting
argumentation, based on solid analysis, that these platforms, although
exhibiting the application of physics and engineering principles clearly beyond
our present-day capabilities, do not appear to defy these principles in any
fundamental way.
1. The book also comes highly recommended in a Frontispiece by Apollo 14
astronaut Edgar Mitchell, and in a Foreword by retired
McDonnell Douglas R&D manager Robert M. Wood. [Back]
2. Ass't Chief, Pilotless
Aircraft Research Div.; Assoc. Chief, Applied Materials and Physics Div.
Retired from NASA in 1970. [Back]
3.Recent examples of the discussion of the technical
aspects of candidate field propulsion mechanisms of this type are given in M. Alcubierre, "The warp drive: hyper-fast travel within
general relativity," Class. and Quantum Grav., vol. 11, p. L73 (1994), and in H. Puthoff, "SETI, the velocity-of-light limitation, and
the Alcubierre warp drive: An integrating
overview," Phys. Essays vol. 9, No. 1, p. 156 (March 1996). [Back]
******